| Using regular premium endowment for retirement planning |
|
|
|
| Written by Wilfred Ling | ||||||
| Wednesday, 17 December 2008 | ||||||
|
That day someone asked me whether does it make sense to use regular premium endowment for retirement planning. My answer was as follows:
The following is what I quoted him for non-smoker male age next birthday 33: Premium: 11,226.90 annually for 20 years. At maturity at the end of 25 years, the GUARANTEED maturity benefit is $390,000 representating a guaranteed internal rate of return of 3.5%pa. This is regardless of market condition (unless the insurer goes belly up!). There is also a non-guaranteed maturity benefit that depends on the insurer's rate of return. If the insurer earns 5.25%, the maturity benefit is $390,000+84,729=$474,729. This represents an internal rate of return of 4.71%. Thus the reduction in yield (or the expense ratio) is 0.54% per annum. If the insurer earns 3.75%, the maturity benefit is $390,000+$7,590=$397,590. This represents an internal rate of return of 3.62%. Thus the reduction in yield (or the expense ratio) is 0.13% per annum. In this market condition (and likely in the future), it is impossible to obtain such high guaranteed return over a long period of time. Not even Singapore Government Bonds can do it because SGS pays out the coupons which is subjected to reinvestment risk.
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.26
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



