| Question on Risk Classification |
|
|
|
| Written by Wilfred Ling | ||||||
| Sunday, 12 July 2009 | ||||||
|
"Hi Wilfred, I hope to get your opinion on the Risk Classification of XXX product. XXX is a a structured product with YYY reference entities. There is no effect on capital and payout with the fall of the first ZZZ entities. However there is substantial impact at the fall of the JJJth entity. At the fall of the KKKrd entity the full capital is erased. How do you classify the RISK of this plan? - Mrs P" Dear Mrs. P, Risk classification is just nonsense to me. There is no such thing as a product being a low risk or a high risk. It depends on the client's existing portfolio, financial objectives and personal experience. Take for example, fixed deposits are seemingly "low risk" but if a young person save everything up in fixed deposits there is a good chance that such a person will have difficulty retiring because his or her money is being eroded by inflation and not working hard. Thus in that view, a fixed deposit can be a "high risk." Take another example, if a product has the same standard deviation as equity but is perfectly negatively correlated, such a product if placed into a person portfolio which currently consist of entirely equity will increase the sharpe ratio significantly. From that point of view, such a product is "low risk" to such a person. Thus if you ask me about risk classification - I am sorry to say that that's just nonsense to me. Wilfred
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.26
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



